For years, I thought that the New Testament picture of support for and opposition against Jesus was painted in black and white. I don’t know why I thought that – I doubt I ever heard pastors or professors put it that way. Nevertheless, I assumed that the Sadducees, Pharisees, and Herodians – the people who constituted Israel’s Jewish leadership – were unified in their opposition to Jesus, while the “common people heard him gladly” (Mark 12:37). But there is more to the story than that.
I was never quite sure what to do with Nicodemus and Joseph of Arimathea. They were Pharisees, and of course the Pharisees were Jesus’s earliest and most vocal adversaries. But Joseph was explicitly said to be a secret disciple of Jesus, and Nicodemus was, at the very least, helpful to Jesus. (But I think he joined Jesus’s camp in the end.)
It is true that Jesus had many enemies, but he also found friends in unexpected places, even among the members of groups that publicly opposed him. The New Testament hints that there were cracks in the anti-Jesus bloc and portrays the Jewish leadership as anything but monolithic.
The group that was most vehement in its antipathy toward Jesus was the Pharisees. Yet one of Jesus’s early personal (and positive) encounters was with “a man of the Pharisees” named Nicodemus. He was influential: John refers to him as a “member of the Jewish ruling council (the Sanhedrin), and Jesus calls him “the teacher of Israel” (John 3:10). At their first meeting, Nicodemus spoke candidly: “Rabbi, we know that you are a teacher come from God.” Notice the “we” in that sentence. Nicodemus was apparently not the only Pharisee who held Jesus in high regard.
We meet Nicodemus again in chapter 7. He is on the floor of the Sanhedrin, attempting to deter the council from arresting Jesus. He argues that Jewish law prohibits an arrest without cause. His argument is airtight: what Jewish council member is going to flout the Jewish law? But this is where we see a rift open among the Jewish authorities. Having no answer, one of Nicodemus’s fellow-Pharisees turns on him instead. “Are you from Galilee too?” he snarls.
Nicodemus was not the only council member, still less the only Jewish leader, who thought that Jesus might be a good man. Most notably, there was wealthy Joseph of Arimathea, another council member, who was a secret disciple during the time of Jesus’s ministry. When Jesus was executed, Joseph came out of the discipleship closet. He boldly went to the Roman prefect and requested that Jesus’s body be given into his care. Then, with Nicodemus’s help, Joseph buried Jesus in his own tomb.
There were other people in Jewish leadership who thought Jesus was the Messiah, or at least that he was an honorable person. In John 12, we read that “…many even among the leaders believed in him. But because of the Pharisees they would not confess their faith for fear they would be put out of the synagogue…” It is doubtful that all these believers came from the Pharisees, for after the resurrection there was a Jesus movement among the Sadducees, specifically among the priests (Acts 6:7)!
If one reads the gospels closely, one discovers that Pharisees are with Jesus on various occasions. What were they doing there, especially when they had already decided to put out of the synagogue anyone who confessed that Jesus was the Messiah? Perhaps they were there collecting evidence to use against Jesus, but nothing in the text suggests that. It is more likely that they were trying to decide if Jesus was the Messiah. As late as John 9, it is evident that the Pharisees were not unified in their opposition to Jesus (John 9:16).
In Luke 13:31, it was Pharisees who warned Jesus that Herod was looking to kill him. It is possible, as some scholars think, that the Pharisees’ real motive was to frighten Jesus into leaving. But seeing the divisions that existed among the Jewish leadership regarding Jesus, it is also possible that their warning was in earnest and came from good intentions.
What can we learn from this? I think we can learn that the biblical story is more complex than we are sometimes led to believe. Those of us who teach must be careful not to oversimplify the story in our rush to improve people’s feelings or adjust their behaviors.
We can also learn this: Jesus may have friends where one least expects them. If he could have friends on the Sanhedrin and among his fiercest critics, he might have friends in Congress—on what we think of as the wrong side of the aisle. He might have friends in Tehran in the Majlis, or in the drug-infested housing development on your city’s south side, or on the faculty of that famously progressive/conservative university that you despise. I cannot assume that Jesus has no friends over there; I can only make sure that I am being his friend right here.


Leave a comment