The Lesson My Dad Taught Me

My dad was a tough guy. He served as a Marine in the 1940s. He married while he was still in the Corps and was divorced not long after. I know almost nothing of his first marriage and only learned about it as an adult. He married my mother in 1953 and they had two sons: my older brother Kevin and me.

My dad was not an easy person to live with. When he was drinking – and he did a lot of drinking when I was young – it was best to keep your distance. I would not say that he was abusive, but he was angry. He could be verbally spiteful, especially to my mother.

He stopped drinking in the mid-sixties. Again, I never learned the whole story but there was a night when there was a run-in with other tough guys in the neighborhood and the police were called. I don’t know what my mother said to him that night, but he stopped drinking and, shortly thereafter, quit hanging out with his drinking buddies.

A year or so after that, my older brother was diagnosed with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. I can only think that my dad was resentful: here he was trying to straighten up and be a good dad, and this happened. My brother went through chemotherapy, many hospitalizations and blood transfusions, but his condition slowly deteriorated.

My family didn’t attend church, except once or twice at Easter to make my grandmother happy. But now, with disaster looming, my dad accepted an invitation to attend the local church. I suspect my parents, having tried everything else, thought they would give God a shot. It was a bargain of sorts: we’ll give you your due if you will spare our son.

That bargain did not work out as they hoped. My brother died. But the church took us in and on an April day in 1968, my dad professed faith in Jesus Christ.

I too confessed Christ and began to change. But the change that had begun in my dad seemed to stall out as time went on. He carried a big chip on his shoulder and lots of anger in his heart.

When hospital bills strained family finances, my mother had to go to work. Dad’s church attendance became erratic. He hit a low point and went out and got drunk. My esteem for my dad also hit a low point. By the time I left for college, the two of us were not getting along well.

I went on to get married and have kids and we frequently made the 70 mile trip home to visit. I couldn’t help but notice that my dad had mellowed. He was a gentle and loving grandpa, though the short-tempered husband continued to make appearances.

Over the next few years, the change in my dad became more apparent. I sometimes whispered to my wife, “Who is this man?” He was more attentive to my mother and more affectionate with all of us. By the early nineties, I was asking his opinion about decisions I needed to make, something I had not done since I was a child.

When he died, I officiated his funeral, per his request. In preparation, I looked through his Bible to see if he had highlighted anything, for I would often find him sitting at the kitchen table early in the morning, a cigarette in one hand and a cup of coffee in the other, reading his Bible. He had marked many passages that spoke to him.

I saw with a sudden clarity what I had been blind to earlier. There was a correlation between the changes we had witnessed – the gentleness and kindness to my mother, the generosity he displayed toward others, his choice not to retaliate when wronged – and the scriptures he had highlighted. The spiritual life that had begun in him years earlier had blossomed and was bearing sweet fruit.

The final and, perhaps, most enduring lesson my dad taught me was that God can change anyone, even him. Even me. That lesson has proved invaluable, and I am especially grateful to have learned it from him.

(First published by Gannett.)

Posted in Bible, relationships, Spiritual life | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Things I’m Glad My Dad Didn’t Teach Me

(For Father’s Day I am posting a piece first published in 2015 by Gatehouse Media.)

After reading an article by Peter Scholl, a forty-something married man with kids, living in Australia, I find myself grateful for the things my dad didn’t teach me. Scholl reflects on what contemporary culture teaches boys and men about their identity, especially in the media.

Scholl writes that when he watches sports on TV, he is confused by how the advertisers and commentators think of guys like him. He says they imagine that he and men like him all wish they were 19 again, and think “the key elements of a happy life are (in no particular order) bacon, having fun with your mates, and beer.”

Further, they portray husbands as “hopeless” men who “can’t be trusted to do the grocery shopping, buy clothes for the kids, or articulately express an opinion when it comes to colour, style or appearance.” And “as a father, you are a joke. Your kids don’t take you seriously.”

He goes on to say that the media represents wives as killjoys and faithfulness in marriage as a sign of weakness or cowardice. The only happy place for a man to be is in a bar, surrounded by friends and, no doubt, 19-year-old girls.

Now it’s true my dad couldn’t be trusted to do the grocery shopping. When my mother was recuperating after surgery, he did the shopping, and I went with him. He bought junk food, any sale item that caught his eye, and the worst tasting off-brand foods ever produced.

And he was, admittedly, a terrible cook. When he got done preparing a steak, it should have been licensed as a deadly weapon. When he tried to bake a cake for my mother’s birthday and the recipe instructed him to “fold in an egg” he was completely bewildered. The only thing my dad could find in the kitchen was his place at the table. He could not have tracked down the baking soda, had his life depended on it.

Yet he didn’t teach my brother and me that dads are a joke. We knew he meant what he said. We saw him break up a violent fight between two men who were trying to kill each other. On another occasion, he apprehended a robbery suspect as he was breaking into the store across the street, and held him until the police arrived. He taught us that dads are courageous.

I’m also grateful my dad didn’t teach us that happiness comes from flirting with 19-year-old girls. I never saw his eye wander and never heard him say anything suggestive about a woman. He remained faithful to my mother until his death in 1996.

It’s true that my dad could have taught my brother and me that the only happy place for a man was in a bar – he drank a lot when we were young. In fact, his drinking caused problems, and brought the family to a crisis. That’s when he chose to quit drinking, to distance himself from some of his friends, and to concentrate on his family. In so doing, he taught us that a dad can do things he doesn’t want to do, but needs to do, for the sake of his family.

I’m glad my dad did not teach me to swear. Looking back on it now, I’m really surprised that he didn’t. He was as tough a guy as you’d ever want to know: a two-fisted Marine, who never backed down from a fight. When I was younger (and he was still drinking), he often lost his temper. Most of the men that hung around with my dad could swear a blue streak. But I never heard him use profanity – not even once.

I’m especially grateful my dad didn’t teach me that believing in God is for weaklings. When my brother was dying of cancer, my two-fisted, never-turn-away-from-a-fight father turned to God for help. His first years as a Christian were sometimes rocky – he brought his anger and pride with him into his new relationship with God – but he stuck it out.

By his example he taught me that a man really can change. He became increasingly attentive and loving to my mother. His confidence in God increased. His willingness to be known as a Christian grew. He became a kinder and gentler man. I’m grateful for the things my dad didn’t teach me, but I’m even more grateful that he taught me this.

Posted in Family, Marriage and Family, relationships, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Can You Hear Me Now? (1 Samuel 2-3)

Listening time: Approximately 25 minutes.

Posted in Bible, Sermons, Spiritual life | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Life on Earth: Comedy or Tragedy?

We owe the words “comedy” and “tragedy” to the ancient Greeks, whose stage plays in the fifth and fourth centuries B.C. gave rise to the terms. A hundred years of films and about 80 years of commercial television have left us thinking that comedies are comic and tragedies are sad. The Greeks were more nuanced.

Tragedy may contain humorous moments and funny characters, but what makes a tragedy tragic is that it ends badly. The hero fails, the aspiration goes unfulfilled, night falls. Comedies, though they may have intensely unhappy moments and deeply disturbing characters, end well. The loser wins, the impossible goal is achieved, and a better day dawns.

Shakespeare followed the Greeks in writing both tragedies and comedies. Some of his tragedies contain comic scenes. The drunken porter’s soliloquy in “Macbeth” comes to mind. The comedies, on the other hand, sometimes include distressing scenes. Think of the “Merchant of Venice.” Act 5 ends with the young lovers together, but two men’s lives have been ruined in the process.

The difference between a comedy and a tragedy is not that one is funny and the other is sad, but that one comes out right in the end and the other does not. So, what kind of story are we in? Is life on earth a comedy or a tragedy? It all depends on how it ends.

For secularists, life on earth is, and can only be, a tragedy. Even if humanity is someday capable of removing all diseases and can stop the planet’s residents from destroying it, the story always ends the same way: the sun dies, the galaxy goes dark, the universe implodes, night falls. It may be an exceedingly long story with many happy moments, but it is inescapably tragic.

(It should be said that many secularists are working hard to make the story a happy one for as many people as possible and for as long as possible. This is commendable and should be acknowledged. God bless them.)

For secularists, life is a tragedy. For Christians, it is a comedy. They believe that God’s story ends well. Or rather, that it goes on well forever. The end is not a dark galaxy and an imploding universe but, in St. Paul’s language, the liberation of creation “into the glorious freedom of the children of God.”

All great comedies – and God’s is by far the greatest – are composed of shorter stories. Whether it is Shakespeare’s “The Winter’s Tale” or Wendell Berry’s “Jayber Crow,”great stories are filled with characters whose individual stories intertwine and combine to move the plot forward. These internal stories can be funny or sad, pleasant or painful. They can even conclude badly.

Unlike human authors who generate their characters’ every thought and action, God literally gives his characters a life of their own. He allows them to live that life – to write their own story – as they see fit. If they refuse to collaborate with the creator, their story will be a tragedy. Yet God will edit, compile, and fit it into his own glorious comedy, which is guaranteed to end well. Just read the final two chapters of the Bible.

People who believe they are living in a tragedy are bound to feel and act differently from those who believe they are in a comedy. If the end is personal, planetary, and universal extinction, then present pleasure and comfort become all-important. Selfish people crave these temporal goods for themselves. Altruistic people seek them for others, even for humanity itself. But whether for self or others, such goods remain temporal, even short-lived.

Perhaps this explains why St. Paul writes that those who are “alienated from God … have given themselves over to sensuality…” Sensuality provides the shortest route to pleasure and comfort. Sensuality cannot lead to meaning but it does provide distraction and, if life is a tragedy, people need all the distraction they can get.

In the end, it is not what happens to us but how we respond – and who we trust – that makes our little stories comedies or tragedies, Macbeth’s “tale told by an idiot,” or a tale told by an infinitely wise and loving creator.

(First published by Gannet.)

Posted in Theology, Worldview and Culture | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

What Does the Author of Hebrews Mean by “Made Perfect”?

I was reading Scot McKnight’s book, Embracing Grace, and was surprised to see how he correlates the author of Hebrews use of the term “made perfect” (τελειωθεὶς) with the resurrection. In Hebrews 5:8-9, we read that the Son “learned obedience from what he suffered and, once made perfect, became the source of eternal salvation for all who obey him.”

There is a lot to explore in that verse but I want to focus on McKnight’s correlation between being “made perfect” and resurrection. In Hebrews, does “made perfect” stand for “resurrected” through metonymy?

There are five uses of “made perfect” in Hebrews. If the author consistently uses the term to stand for resurrection, it should be possible to substitute the term “resurrected” each time and it should make good sense. So let’s try it.

The first use is in the passage mentioned above (5:9). If we substitute “resurrected” through metonymy, the sentence does make sense: the Son “learned obedience from what he suffered and, once resurrected, became the source of eternal salvation for all who obey him.”

The next use is in 7:28, where we find: “For the law appoints as high priests men who are weak; but the oath, which came after the law, appointed the Son, who has been made perfect forever.” It is questionable whether “the Son, who has been resurrected forever,” quite fits the bill in this instance. What would it mean to be resurrected temporally rather than forever? Does that even make sense?

In 10:14, we have something similar: “because by one sacrifice he has made perfect forever those who are being made holy.” Substituting “resurrected” here is awkward: “because by one sacrifice he has resurrected forever those who are being made holy.” It is hard to see how the one sacrifice resurrected those who are being made holy. At the same time, awkwardness is not conclusive. Translation from one language to another is always awkward.

Metonymy in Hebrews 11:40 might be possible: “God had planned something better for us so that only together with us would they be made perfect.” “…that only together with us would they be resurrected.”

12:23 is also ambiguous: “to the church of the firstborn, whose names are written in heaven. You have come to God, the judge of all men, to the spirits of righteous men made perfect.” Could the spirits of righteous men be “resurrected”? Yes, but the Bible does not really speak of resurrected “spirits” but rather resurrected people, especially resurrected bodies (see Isa. 26:19).

So the question of whether “made perfect” in Hebrews might stand for “resurrected” remains undecided. I think the weight of the evidence works against the hypothesis that “made perfect” can be used as a metonym for “resurrected.” This, however, does not mean that it can never stand for “resurrected” through metonymy. McKnight may be correct in making the connection in 5:9, but it remains – for me, at least – uncertain.

Posted in Bible, Theology | Tagged , , , , , | 3 Comments

The Convergence

We’re just started a series in the Books of Samuel titled, Into the Look Glass. This first sermon explores how our pains and sorrows can become the intersection where God’s love and the world’s need meet. (Listening time: approximately 25 minutes.

Posted in Bible, Spiritual life, Worldview and Culture | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Learning Theology at the County Fair

I went to my first county fair during the summer between sixth and seventh grade. My friend’s parents took us, and we boys headed immediately to the midway to scope out the rides. The first one we tried was “The Rotor,”a large cylinder that spun like a top. The spinning created a centrifugal effect which “pinned” riders against the wall.

Moments after the ride ended, I was throwing up in a trash barrel. Should I ever be elected to Congress, the first bill I introduce will state: “Whereas, it is a matter of public health; and whereas, it is in the interest of the general welfare; and whereas, national security could be threatened, all centrifugal force rides shall be banned within these United States.”

Half the Congress would line up to co-sponsor the bill.

The centrifugal effect pushes objects away from the center. This is the opposite of centripetal force which pulls objects toward the center. In fact, the centrifugal effect only exists when centripetal force is in play.

In theology, there is a spiritual dynamic that is roughly analogous to centrifugal force. Theologians have traditionally spoken of it as the fall of humanity or the fall of Adam, but I suggest that the concept of a centrifugal spiritual force might offer fresh insights into this classic doctrine.

When theologians speak of the fall, they usually picture it as something that happened long ago, when the representative human chose to disobey God. To speak of his “fall” is to evoke the image of a tragic incident that occurred in the deep past and is now completed. The “fall” itself is over, but humanity was broken in the landing.

This image, I think, conveys the important truth that humanity’s movement away from God began at a particular point in time but it fails to adequately bring out the idea that our distance from God continues to increase. The Bible doesn’t suggest that humanity has fallen and can’t get up. It suggests that humanity hasn’t yet landed and is still moving away from God.

When I rode “The Rotor” all those years ago, I felt stuck to the wall. Try as I might, I was unable to move toward the center. Neither could anyone else. No one was strong enough to overcome that centrifugal (“center fleeing”) force. Apart from outside intervention – say, cutting off the power – we were all stuck.

Sin – rebellion against God – not only caused humanity to fall; it caused us to get stuck. “Still in your sins,” was how St. Paul put it. None of us is capable of freeing ourselves and moving to the Center – toward God. Theologians employ the concept of depravity to express this human inability. But sin’s effects go further still, for its centrifugal force is still in play.

The theological term “depravity” helps us understand the damage sin causes within individuals, but it falls short of picturing the way sin distances the individual from God and from others.

A thought experiment may help us here. Imagine a “Rotor” ride in which the floor not only drops away, but the walls continually – eternally – expand and recede. This would simultaneously increase people’s distance from the center and from each other.

This image helps us grasp what is happening in society. As people move away from God they also move away from each other. C. S. Lewis captured this dynamic in “The Great Divorce” by picturing hell as a place where people are forever increasing the distance between themselves and others.

Because we’ve always lived under these conditions, we don’t see it as strange. People distrusting and even hating each other feels normal. People doubting God’s goodness – even his existence – is “just the way it is.” But, as Cornelius Plantinga put it, it is “not the way it’s supposed to be.”

Apart from outside intervention, a re-union with God and real communion with people is impossible. The forces in play are just too strong. But Christians believe that intervention has already happened and that those forces have been disrupted by the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus. God is unsticking people from “The Rotor”of sin and bringing them to himself.

(First published by Gannett.)

Posted in Peace with God, Theology | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Nothing Fails Like Success

Elijah was arguably the chief of the Old Testament prophets. At one point in his life, Elijah’s courage failed him and he fell into such despair that he wished himself dead. But failure did not get the last word. Elijah recovered and finished well, useful both to God and to his people.

Failure sometimes follows close on the heels of success. The person who gets the dream job (success) allows that job to take the place of their spouse (failure). He or she gets promotions but ends up with a divorce.

The child of an alcoholic vows never to be like his dad. He doesn’t drink (success). But the resentment he carries around with him damages his own kids (failure), and they choose to get back at their dad by – what else? – drinking.

The kid who never had enough food and had to wear hand-me-down clothes works hard, makes a lot of money, and provides her kid with the best of everything (success). The only thing missing is a relationship (failure).

G. K. Chesterton said, “There is nothing that fails like success.” That was true in the case of Elijah. He had just come from a spectacular victory, seven years in the making, but completed in a single day. He was the hero. He had – it seemed – singlehandedly turned the tide of history.

Yet, within days, he was running for his life, convinced that he was a colossal failure. Following his victory – and it was a major victory, one of the biggest in biblical history – Elijah naturally had expectations. After seven years of isolation from friends and family, he could finally come out of hiding. After constant uncertainty, life would normalize. No more loneliness. No more danger. His success would continue and expand and everything would be great.

But success will always be relative until Christ returns and makes it absolute. If we confuse a relative success for an ultimate victory, we will later on find ourselves discounting that success or even regarding it as failure. That seems to have happened to Elijah.

It wasn’t long before Elijah’s real (albeit relative) success turned into a real (albeit relative) failure: He ran away. He then further complicated matters by isolating himself (that is verse 3), which is what people do when they think of themselves as failures. Solitude can be spiritually helpful, but when our thinking is muddled it can be harmful.

Unfortunately, most people enter solitude at the wrong time and for the wrong reason. Instead of entering it when they are spiritually strong (as Jesus did), they enter it when they are weak (as Elijah did). Instead of doing it to encounter God, they do it to avoid people, which just makes things worse.

When we’ve failed – when we are certain that we are failures – is there hope for recovery? Is success relative while failure is absolute? Consider the story of “Wrong Way Riegels.” Playing for UCLA in the Rose Bowl, Roy Riegels recovered a Georgia Tech fumble, ran as hard as he could, and was tackled just short of the goal line – by his teammate.  He was running to the wrong end zone. Tech converted his blunder into points on the scoreboard. Riegels was humiliated. Broken. A colossal failure.

In the locker room at half time, the coach tried to reignite the team, but Riegels just sat there with a blanket over his shoulders and his face buried in his hands. Just before they went back on the field, Coach said: “Men, the same team that played the first half will start the second.”

The players got up and started out, but Riegels stayed where he was. The coach looked back and called to him. He didn’t move. Failure had him and wouldn’t let go. Coach Price went over to where he sat and said, “Roy, didn’t you hear me? The same team that played the first half will start the second.”

Riegels started crying. He said, “Coach, I can’t do it. I’ve ruined you. I’ve ruined the university’s reputation. I’ve ruined myself. I can’t face that crowd out there.”

Coach Price put his hand on Riegel’s shoulder and said, “Roy, get up and go on back. The game is only half over.” Roy did, he played hard, and performed well.

Telling your story can make a difference. After Elijah told his story to God, do you know what God said to him? “Elijah, get up and go on back. The game is only half over.” And he did.

You’ve blundered. You’ve run in the wrong direction. We all have. We’ve hurt ourselves and others. But the game is only half over. Or rather, it is only just beginning.

When we confess your sin and failure, God restores us. He gives us a role to play. He sends us back into the game. It is true that success is relative, but so is failure. It only becomes absolute when we choose to stay in it rather than go to God.

(Excerpted from Failure: Not the Last Word. To view the sermon, click here.)

Posted in Bible, Sermons | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Failure: Not the Last Word (1 Kings 19)

Everyone fails but not everyone rebounds from failure. What – or who – makes the difference?

Listening Time: 24:00 (approx.)
Posted in Bible, Sermons, Spiritual life | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Share Your Favorite Books (Just for fun Sunday)

When I am in an airport, sitting in the blue vinyl chairs (why are they always blue?), and one person out of the 200 surrounding me is reading a book, I am immediately curious about that person – and their book. I try to get a peak at the cover. I walk by just to get a closer look.

I have been borrowing library books ever since I was an elementary school student, when I would walk a mile downtown just to get to the library! Books have played a major role in my life. They have delighted me, instructed me, corrected me, angered me, and haunted me.

What is the book you most enjoyed reading? For me, it was The Lord of the Rings, which I read in my early 20s, then read again a few years later, then read to my sons a decade after that. I’ve now lost track of how many times I have read LOTR.

What is the book (besides the Bible!) that has helped you most spiritually? This is a hard one. I would like to mention a dozen, at least, but I will limit myself to one: Dallas Willard’s Renovation of the Heart.

What is the book that bored you most but that you finished nonetheless? For me, it was Moby Dick. A hundred pages of details about whales teeth and the shapes of their heads was just too much for me. (Okay. Maybe it was only twenty pages, but if seemed like a hundred.)

What is your favorite children’s book? For me, it was Winnie the Pooh. I read the stories so often to my children – and laughed out loud while reading – that I had most of them memorized. (Note: I do not count C. S. Lewis’s Chronicles of Narnia here, for it is hard for me to regard them as children’s books. Rather, they are beautiful books that can be read profitably by children and adults alike. I do not include Wind in the Willows, At the Back of the North Wind, The Princess and the Goblin, etc. for the same reason.)

What book was recommended to you that you would never recommend to anyone else? There have been so many such books – pastors are constantly being given books – that is it hard to choose just one. Besides that, I usually forget those books the moment I close them. One that comes to mind, though, is Johnathon Cahn’s, The Harbinger. The friend who gave it to me loved it. I did not. I’ll leave it at that.

So, here are the categories: Most Enjoyable; Most Helpful Spiritually; Most Boring; Favorite Children’s Book. Tell us yours (from any or all of the categories) in the comment section below. Then we can enjoy – or avoid – them too.

Posted in Books | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment