“Storied” People

The people of Jesus are “storied” people. They not only know the story, they live the story;  it is still going on.

You can hear the climactic episode of the ongoing story told in three parts at http://lockwoodchurch.org/media. Part I (See, Your King Comes, March 25) tells the exciting story of Jesus’s entry into Jerusalem. It is a story of hope, conflict, and misunderstanding, set in a politically volatile time. Part II (Holy Week Communion, March 29) tells the story of the night Jesus was betrayed. Part III (See, Your King Comes, April 1) looks at the first Easter morning from the perspective of Mary Magdalene.

Don’t stop celebrating Easter!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

More Than Colored Eggs and Chocolate Bunnies

The Easter circulars came out last week, and they were full of little girls’ dresses and little boys’ suits. Pastel colors were everywhere, dyed eggs and chocolate bunnies ubiquitous. Every kind of ham you can imagine, and some you’ve never heard of, is on sale: bone-in, bone-out, hickory-smoked, spiral-sliced, honey-glazed, and more.

In our increasingly post-Christian society, these are the things people know about the holiday. If you told them what Easter is really about, they would hardly believe it.

Easter, as a Christian holiday – the Christian holiday – is an anniversary celebration. It’s not about how people dress or what they eat, but about what happened early on a Spring morning outside Jerusalem around the year 29 of the Common Era. It was the day that changed the world.

Though the sun still rose in the east and the earth still spun on its axis, Easter transformed the world. It was the first day of the last times. Easter, Christians believe, marked the beginning of the end of death, and the beginning of the beginning of life everlasting—it changed everything.

Too often, people think of Jesus’s resurrection as nothing more than a reassuring proof that there is life after death. But on that first Easter, no one was asking for that kind of proof. The overwhelming majority of people across the earth and across time already believed in life after death.

The early Christians did not think of Jesus’s resurrection as evidence they would live on as spirits or ghosts or life-forces in some ethereal heaven. Once they realized that Jesus was not merely alive but resurrected, they began announcing the dawn of the new age. They believed “the renewal of all things” (to use Jesus’s own words) had commenced. They did not see Jesus’s resurrection as some one-off event, but as the first stone in an avalanche.

To the early Christians, Jesus’s resurrection was not just confirmation that death had been defeated— though it was certainly that. It was proof that God’s kingdom was at hand and his ancient promise to renew all things – to make everything right – would surely be fulfilled. It was proof to the disciples, as Chesterton once put it, that the world had died in the night and that “what they were looking at was the first day of a new creation…”

For the biblical writers, the resurrection was not so much proof that we will go to heaven when we die as proof that God’s kingdom had come to earth while we live. It was confirmation that the new age had dawned or, to be more precise, that the new age is dawning. People sometimes ask the question, “What would you do if you knew you were going to die tomorrow?” The biblical writers would more likely have asked, “What would you do if you knew you were going to live tomorrow – live fully in God’s kingdom here on earth?

The resurrection convinced early Christians that God’s kingdom had invaded earth. They also believed the complementary truth that God’s king, and not death, will have the last word. There is life on the other side of the tomb.

My wife and I have a Sunday morning routine. For the last 30 years, I have left the parsonage before her and crossed the field, heading for worship service. Before I leave, I always kiss her and say, “See you over there.”

Someday one of us will leave the other and cross the threshold of death, not heading for church but for glory. On that day, we won’t say goodbye; goodbye is not the right word. When C. S. Lewis left Sheldon Vanauken in Oxford, he told him, “I shan’t say goodbye. We’ll meet again.” When he got to the other side of the street, he turned and yelled: “Besides—Christians never say goodbye.”

Because of the resurrection, there will be no need to say goodbye to my wife. I’ll just say, as I’ve said a thousand times before, “See you over there” – not in some ethereal heaven in which we are ill at ease, uncomfortable guests, but in our own place, prepared by Christ, humanity’s true home.

First published in The Coldwater Daily Reporter, 3/31/2018

Posted in Faith, Peace with God, Spiritual life, Theology | Tagged , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Need Help Getting Ready for Easter?

If you’re like me, Easter time is very busy: Gone most evenings, with lots of things on the calendar and the to-do list. It’s easy for Easter to sneak up and find us unprepared to celebrate the biggest thing that ever happened.

If you have time this week, you might listen to the story of Palm Sunday to help you get ready for Easter and make the most of Holy Week. You can hear it here: See, Your King Comes. 

Hope this week is spiritually rich for you!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Preacher, Prophet, Martyr, Saint

Pope Francis has made the canonization of Archbishop Oscar Romero his own project. Though the lengthy process was begun during the papacy of John Paul II, opposition caused it to stall. But in 2015, Francis beatified Romero, which opened the door to eventual canonization.

Who was Oscar Romero? To understand the man, one must start with his country. El Salvador is the smallest and most densely populated nation in Central America. In El Salvador, the gulf between the haves and have-nots is wider and deeper than anything North Americans have ever known. As El Salvador entered the 20th century, its land and wealth was concentrated in the hands of just fourteen families, known simply as “The Fourteen.”

Coffee was king in those days, and “The Fourteen” were the Salvadoran nobility. Most of the rest of the people of El Salvador were little more than serfs. They didn’t own land or homes. Half of their wages were “appropriated to provide housing. There was no health care. Worse, there was no hope for improvement.

Romero, who was born in 1917, grew up in this world. His father hoped to instruct him in a trade, but young Oscar believed himself called to ministry in the church. At age 14, he began his studies, which were interrupted briefly by his mother’s illness. After graduating from the national seminary in San Salvador, he went to the Gregorian University in Rome.

In 1943, Romero returned to El Salvador, where he served as a parish priest and, later, as the rector of the diocesan seminary. In 1966, he became the editor of the archdiocesan newspaper, where he had a reputation as a quiet intellectual and a staunch defender of traditional Roman Catholic values.

In 1974, the rather reticent and bookish priest was appointed bishop of a poor diocese in rural El Salvador. During that time, the influence of liberation theology was growing across Central America, and with it the popularity of Marxist ideology. Liberation theology promised hope to the poor and generationally oppressed, but the newly appointed bishop remained steadfastly opposed to it, believing it to conflict with Catholic doctrine.

In 1977, Bishop Romero was elevated to Archbishop of El Salvador, to the consternation of progressives in the Church. They did not see the rather quiet traditionalist as a friend of El Salvador’s poor. They could not have been more wrong.

A few weeks after his appointment as Archbishop, Romero’s dear friend and fellow-priest, Rutillo Grande, an advocate for El Salvador’s poor, was assassinated. His work to help the poor achieve self-sufficiency had been considered a threat to the nation’s rigid social structure, and an affront to the wealthy. Standing over the dead body of his friend, Romero made up his mind to continue his work.

Romero never wavered in his stand against liberation theology and Marxism, but now he had something to stand for, not just against: he stood for the poor. But in El Salvador in the 1970s, standing for the poor was a risky thing to do. The Archbishop knew that. He once said, “I do not believe in death without resurrection. If they kill me, I will be resurrected in the Salvadoran people.”

Romero began broadcasting his Sunday sermons, which became the most popular radio program in the nation. He wrote President Jimmy Carter, begging him to stop sending military aid, which was being used to repress the people. Fearing the spread of communism, the U.S. was pouring money into training Salvadoran special forces. Those forces later committed unthinkable atrocities against the poor, most of whom had never even heard of Karl Marx.

Though he knew it was risky, Romero called on soldiers to disobey any order to kill their fellow-peasants. Days before his assassination, he told a reporter, “You can tell the people that if they succeed in killing me, that I forgive and bless those who do it … A bishop will die, but the church of God, which is the people, will never perish.”

To almost everyone’s surprise, the quiet priest found courage to become a preacher, prophet, and martyr. A deeply spiritual man, Romero received strength from the savior of El Salvador, the savior of the world, to whom his life unreservedly belonged.

First published in The Coldwater Daily Reporter, 3/24/2018

Posted in Christianity, Church, In the News, Theology | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Alexa, Stop Creeping Me Out

Yet another reason why I don’t own a smartphone or tablet. Alexa, Amazon’s artificial intelligence-based personal assistant, has been laughing at her masters, and it is creeping them out. According to Amazon, it just a voice recognition flaw, but when Alexa laughs maniacally in the middle of the night, it seems more like the prequel to I, Robot.

The software that drives Alexa, that turns on lights, starts espresso machines, and makes her laugh, is driven by a remote server somewhere. Alexa is simply an ear and a mouthpiece; her brain is far away. Or, to use an image from an earlier era: Alexa is an idol. The god that communicates through the idol is off in some digital heaven somewhere; maybe Silicon Valley.

The case could be made that Alexa is the eidolon – the local manifestation – of a god. You can ask Alexa how to be popular, for steps on a career path, or to calm you down with music, and the goddess will respond. Answers to such prayers are never delayed more than a few fractions of a second. Alexa can provide comfort and companionship, and all one needs do is ask – or should I say, pray?

The Silicon Valley Olympians – Amazon, Apple, Google – are all lightning fast and voice activated. Merely speak the words: “Alexa (or “Siri” or “Google”) please text John and tell him I’ll be there in five minutes,” and what you desire is done. And the sacrifices these deities demand are minimal – $150 for the Amazon god, plus any additional cost of installing devices in your home that will respond to her. More ominously, though, those who bow at her altar entrust their lives to a remote power they know little about but that wants to know everything there is to know about them, including when they go to bed and what’s on their playlist.

The God of the Bible also uses voice commands, only it is his voice, not his adherent’s, that make things happen. He does not need eidolons – local representations like Amazon’s Echo – to get things done.

If you want Alexa to turn on your lights or turn up your heat, you need to install smart bulbs or a smart thermostat that are programmed to respond wirelessly to commands from the Amazon god who resides on the cloud. Alexa will let her adherents freeze before she turns up the heat, unless their smart thermostat is connected and enabled. She has no heart.

That is certainly different from the God of the Bible, but there are similarities in the way they work. He operates wirelessly. He also has programmed his devices to respond to his voice. Think about the first chapter of the book of Genesis, when God said, “’Let there be light,’ and there was light.” Creation has been programmed, connected, and enabled to respond to God’s voice.

The universe God designed is a lot like a smart device – or many trillions of smart devices. Beneath the weird framework of quantum mechanics in our universe lies something deeper: a programming of sorts. Many scientists, recognizing this, have abandoned the long-established mechanistic paradigm of how the universe works and are replacing it with an information paradigm. The have come to believe that quanta, the basic building blocks of the universe, represent information bits – code.

This perspective harmonizes well with the biblical view of a creator who made a universe that responds to his voice. He said, “Let there be light,” his smart creation responded, and the lights came on. He said, “Let there be vegetation” (animals, people, etc.), and it happened. The Bible repeats the words “God said” nine times over the course of six creation days. The psalmist commented: “For he spoke, and it came to be; he commanded, and it stood firm.”

Eugene Peterson, author of the popular Bible paraphrase, The Message, has written of “the massive, overwhelming previousness of God’s speech…” Everything, absolutely everything, including humanity, is voice-activated. But humans have been “disabled” by sin and now must be “enabled” by faith in their creator, the God of Jesus.

As for me, I’ll trust the God known for giving “songs in the night” instead of that other one, the one known for creepy nocturnal laughter.

First published in The Coldwater Daily Reporter, 3/17/18

Posted in Bible, Faith, In the News, Lifestyle | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

The Only Way Out Is Up

When Richard Spencer, the Alt-Right leader and social firebrand, came to Michigan State University this week, four police officers suffered minor injuries and twenty-five people were arrested. According to The Chicago Tribune, only 150 tickets were issued to the event, but even fewer people attended because of the violence that broke out between Spencer supporters and antifascist protestors.

Spencer’s white supremacist rants are deplorable. His apocalyptic vision urges white people to take action before their doom comes. He tells hearers to join his movement if they “want to live,” and warns that American society may end up in a “hot war” waged by people of color against whites.

Richard Spencer may speak with a prophetic passion as he describes, preacher-like, his peculiar end-times revelation, but his views are anything but Christian. His apocalyptic vision contradicts the vision of the New Testament. The hatred he instills and the violence he promotes have nothing in common with the teaching of Jesus or his apostles.

Indeed, Spencer arrogantly claims that Jesus was mistaken when he said, “Blessed are the meek: for they shall inherit the earth.” Spencer, who misunderstands what meekness is, states: “I have never gained anything in my life or my career by watering it down to be just a little bit more palatable. The meek shall never inherit the Earth.”

Either Jesus was right, or Richard Spencer was. For my part, I’ll stand with Jesus, not Spencer.

But I also wouldn’t stand with some of the people who protested against Spencer at MSU. They adopted the very tactics civilized people ought to deplore, shouting vile obscenities at police, and using violence against both police and the people attending Spencer’s lecture. If the hope for peace rests on the shoulders of such people, we’re all in big trouble.

I was once invited to join a protest march against a practice that was deemed racially insensitive. The woman who invited me was a 60s radical for whom the Vietnam war protests marked the high point of her life. She was constantly trying to regain the old sense of purpose and camaraderie she had found on her college campus so long ago.

Perhaps the protestors at MSU were cut from the same cloth: people who were not protesting injustice as much as they were fleeing their own purposelessness. Perhaps they just needed a cause with which to identify themselves. But if their cause is peace, they are going about things the wrong way.

It’s not that they were wrong to take a stand, but taking a stand is different from taking a club, or brass knuckles and knives, as some protestors did. The protestors would have done better to stand for something good, instead of merely standing against something deplorable. The local Episcopal church planned a celebration of diversity to coincide with Spencer’s speaking engagement and received more than 1,000 RSVPs. Imagine if Spencer’s speech had gone on without incident: the local news would have reported that Spencer spoke to 150 attendees, while the diversity celebration attracted more than 1,000. Even Spencer’s supporters would then have had to face the fact of his obvious lack of appeal.

The truth is that hatred, whether it wears a swastika or an Antifa mask, is still hatred. And hatred will never dispel hatred, it will only increase it. Good alone has the power to overcome evil. That is a lesson that Jesus taught and St. Paul reiterated, but that we are regrettably slow to learn.

If one person on the MSU campus had truly engaged Spencer’s muddled supporters with love, he or she could have done more to stop the insanity than all the violent protestors combined. Calling people names only reinforces their prejudices, but a reasoned and respectful debate invites people to reexamine their assumptions. Hearts and minds may not be changed in a day, but they will not be changed at all by busting heads.

The way out of this mess is not to the hard right with Richard Spencer, nor to the hard left with the Antifa protestors. It is not even to the soft right or the soft left. The only way out is up. Our sundered society needs help from above.

First published in The Coldwater Daily Reporter, 3/10/2018

Posted in Bible, Christianity, In the News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

The King of the Castle?

I just finished a short series titled, “The King of the Castle.” The king is not husband/dad but Jesus the Lord. How do we seek (and experience) the kingdom of God in our homes? The first message in the series is titled, “Removing Stumbling Blocks,” and it comes from Romans 14, and was given on February 4. The next three are titled “Righteousness,” “Peace” and “Joy” (from Romans 14:17-19), and were given, respectively, on February 11, February 18, and March 4.

You can listen at http://lockwoodchurch.org/media. While you’re at it, check out the great sermon Kevin Looper preached on February 25 titled, “Seek the Lord With All Your Heart.” His extended illustration from St. Augustine’s life will inspire you.

Posted in Bible, Faith, Marriage and Family, Peace with God | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Chris Pratt Abused for Admitting That He Prays

When the actor Chris Pratt tweeted that he was praying his derriere off – he didn’t use that French word but a ruder English equivalent – for filmmaker Kevin Smith, he was roundly criticized. That is putting it too mildly. He sparked a firestorm.

If, a decade or two ago, I had read that an actor had sparked controversy by saying that he was praying his derriere off, I would have assumed that he was being criticized for his crude way of describing his prayers. Gentle Christians would have been shocked by such an “outrageous” comment.

Not any more. The angry backlash did not happen because Pratt mentioned his backside or suggested he was in danger of losing it through his energetic praying, but because he prayed and had the gall to mention it in public. His accusers were not “gentle Christians” but militant anti-religionists. They didn’t charge him with being rude but being naïve and irrational.

Is it irrational to pray? Has science proved that prayer is based on a lie and people who pray are delusional? Of course not. It would only be irrational to pray if it could be shown that prayers are not answered or that praying is detrimental, which has not happened. If there is a God, and many scientists believe there is, then prayer is not irrational. Prayer may be mysterious, but it is not illogical.

When I first went into full-time Christian ministry, I pastored what might be called a “mission church,” which was unsubsidized by the denomination I served. When I arrived, the church had an average attendance of 19 people on a Sunday morning, and we were constantly on the edge of financial disaster. Four months into my pastorate, the church’s biggest financial supporter died unexpectedly.

For the next few years, paydays often came without pay, or with only a partial paycheck. The church sometimes had to choose between paying us or paying the electric company. There were times when the cupboard was bare and our wallets empty. In those times of need, we would ask God to intervene, and the results were remarkable.

Without ever telling anyone – not even family – our situation, our needs were met again and again. People driving by, people who did not know us, stopped and gave us money, not once but at least three times. They told us God directed them to do so. Money came in the mail on the day it was needed or was placed in an envelope and stuck in the door. One day, I cried out to God, “I need a new car!” and I was given a car that evening. And all this without ever telling a soul about our needs.

Did our prayers have anything to do with it? I cannot prove that they did, but I believe it. Had the people insulting Chris Pratt lived through our experiences, I suspect they would not criticize a person for praying. It might not bring them to believe in the efficacy of prayer, but it would at least restrain them from insulting people who do.

A civil person, even if he or she had doubts about the utility of saying prayers, would at least be grateful for the sympathetic spirit behind them. But I suspect the backlash against Chris Pratt is not really about the rationality of prayer but about controlling the linguistic territory of the public arena. The people criticizing Pratt don’t really want to have a philosophical debate on the existence of God or even a scientific discussion on the development of tools to objectively measure whether prayer is beneficial. They want to control who gets to speak.

That freedom of speech is being challenged is clear. A couple of years ago, the liberal mayor of Houston, the nation’s fourth largest city, subpoenaed local pastors, demanding transcripts of their sermons, like the leader of some authoritarian regime.

Within the last year, academics in both the U.S. and Canada have been reprimanded by their schools and shouted down by opponents for espousing unpopular ideas. Once bastions of free speech, college campuses are becoming the least open places in society.

And then there is poor Chris Pratt, who lost his derriere praying, and was abused for his sacrifice. What’s the world coming to?

First published in The Coldwater Daily Reporter, March 3, 2018

Posted in Christianity, In the News | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Congratulations on Your New Home, Billy

How would Billy Graham respond to all the publicity surrounding his death? I suspect he would do what he routinely did – he was, after all, no stranger to publicity. He would ask himself and his team: “How can we use this to further the cause of Jesus Christ?” Not the cause of The Billy Graham Evangelistic Association. The cause of Jesus.

Christianity Today reports that a Scottish minister once made this observation about Graham: “My first impression of the man at close quarters was not of his good looks but of his goodness; not of his extraordinary range of commitments, but of his own ‘committedness’ to his Lord and Master. To be with him even for a short time is to get a sense of a single-minded man; it shames one and shakes one as no amount of ability and cleverness can do.”

The range of Graham’s accomplishments was extraordinary. He was instrumental in launching Campus Crusade for Christ, was a college president for a few years in the forties, helped establish Christianity Today in 1956, was an ambassador for Christ in the Soviet Bloc and visited Russia to preach the gospel before the fall of communism. But he did these various things with a unifying purpose: to tell the world what God has done through Jesus. That was his assignment.

I was listening to Catholic talk radio in the car the day Rev. Graham died. The host, after pointing out dissimilarities between Billy Graham and Catholic teaching, went on to say repeatedly that he loved Billy Graham. He recognized the hand of God in Graham’s life and ministry.

But not everyone loved Billy Graham. When he invited Doctor Martin Luther King to join him on the platform in New York, segregationists were outraged. Civil rights leaders were also angry and accused Graham of being a coward because he did not take part in the marches.

When Graham went to the Soviet Union, he was called a traitor. Students at his own alma mater, Wheaton College, carried placards announcing, “Billy Graham Has Been Duped by the Soviets.” Others, including members of the U.S. State Department, were harsh in their criticism.

When Graham went to London in 1954 for a three-month long crusade, he spoke to more than two million people. Over 40,000 responded to his invitation to “accept Jesus into your heart.” And yet, fundamentalists at home were furious with Graham for working on the crusade with liberal Christians. Many questioned the genuineness of his faith.

The same thing happened when Billy met with Pope John XXIII and Pope John Paul II. He spent two hours with John Paul and before he left the pope grabbed Graham’s lapels, pulled him forward within inches of his face, and said: “Listen, Graham, we are brothers.” That meeting set Graham’s critics raving, but it is hard for me to believe it did not set heaven singing.

Criticism did not stop Graham from fulfilling his assignment, nor did praise. Queen Elizabeth II sought him out. Presidents, from Truman to Obama, met with him. He was awarded a spot on the Gallop Organization’s most admired people more times than any other American. The Ladies Home journal once ranked Graham second in the category of “achievements in religion.” Who was ranked first? God.

But Graham was careful not to let fame keep him from what he had been called to do. Dr. William Shoemaker, who worked closely with the evangelist as the first Director the Graham Center at Wheaton, said that Graham once told him: “If I don’t give all the credit to the Lord, I feel He would remove my effectiveness – just like what happened to Sampson when his hair was cut.”

In the light of his death, many people are praising Graham now, but some are as critical as ever. What would Graham say? We don’t have to wonder: he told us. Borrowing from the words of his great predecessor D. L. Moody, Graham said: “Someday you will read or hear that Billy Graham is dead. Don’t you believe a word of it. I shall be more alive than I am now. I will just have changed my address.”

Congratulations, Billy, on your new home.

First published in The Coldwater Daily Reporter, 2/24/2018

Posted in In the News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Key to the Good Life

The good life is all about good relationships. Our most serious problems and our greatest accomplishments involve relationships. Studies have repeatedly shown that good relationships contribute more to happiness than success, and bad relationships contribute more to unhappiness than failure.

The Harvard Study of Adult Development has tracked the lives of 724 men for 75 years. The study director, Robert Waldinger, summarized its findings this way: “The clearest message that we get from this 75-year study is this: Good relationships keep us happier and healthier. Period.”

One of Western society’s principal myths envisions the good life waiting at the end of a career path. But the good life is found in healthy and appropriate relationships with those who share the path with us, not at its end. People who sacrifice good relationships for money or career unwittingly pull the rug out from under their own contentment.

The word the Christian tradition uses to denote healthy and appropriate relationships is “righteousness.” The noun and its cognates appear over a thousand times in the Bible. Being righteous was a chief concern of both Jews and Christians.

Unfortunately, many people thought that righteousness was about keeping rules rather than living in right relationships. The Pharisees, who were contemporaries of Jesus, are a case in point. Their experts had composed 39 separate categories of rules just to govern Sabbath Day conduct. Every poor Pharisee had thousands of rules to try to remember and keep.

One rule, for example, prohibited a person from carrying “a burden” on the Sabbath. That seems straightforward enough. But not so fast. What constitutes a burden? To answer that question, religious scholars composed endless lists of proscribed burdens. A burden was food equal in weight to a dried fig, enough wine for mixing in a goblet, milk enough for one swallow, water enough to moisten an eye-salve, ink enough to write two letters of the alphabet”—and on and on.

If memorizing lists like these is what it takes to be “righteous,” the only a righteous people will be nit-picking, fastidious cranks. But the righteous people of the Bible, including Abraham, Moses, David, Ruth, Esther, and especially Jesus, were anything but nit-picking cranks.

Fastidious rule-keeping is not righteousness. A person does not cross the “righteousness boundary” because he or she has achieved 75 percent of perfection on some official list of religious behaviors.

Righteousness is all about relationships. No one, not even God, can be righteous in isolation; it requires relationship. To be righteous is to be right in relationship; that is, to relate appropriately. An appropriate relationship will be different with a spouse than with a boss – it’s probably best not to kiss your boss hello and goodbye – and both will differ from an appropriate relationship with God.

Of course, many people feel like right and good relationships are no longer possible for them. Their relationship with spouse, child, parent, or co-worker has been so badly damaged that it seems beyond repair. So, they give up on good relationships and pursue money or success or endless distraction instead.

But it is never too late. No matter how strained a relationship is, one can always begin to relate appropriately. That won’t “fix” a damaged relationship, which may require years of rebuilding, but it will put it on different footing. Even if the other person rebuffs all communication, one can still act appropriately, given the situation. One can forgive or request forgiveness, pray for the other person, refuse to speak badly and instead speak well of him or her to others. In a badly damaged relationship, such actions might be what righteousness entails.

The good life is about good and healthy relationships, and good and healthy relationships begin in a right relationship with God, made possible through confidence in Jesus Christ. By its very nature, a relationship with God interacts with every other relationship we have, making it the perfect place to start. It gives a person room to stand, and the strength and insight necessary to begin new ways of relating to others.

Put simply: the good life is all about good relationships, and good relationships depend on a right relationship with God.

First published in The Coldwater Daily Reporter, 2/17/2018

Posted in Christianity, Lifestyle, Marriage and Family | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments